Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)

Reliance Jute & Industries Ltd vs C.I.T., West Bengal, Calcutta on 10 October, 1979

27. In the aforesaid case, the expression "income" in the statute appearing in Section 2 (24) of the Act has been clarified to mean that it is an inclusive definition and includes losses, that is, negative profit. This has been held so on the strength of earlier judgments of this Court C.As. @ SLP (C) No. 5241 of 2007 etc.... (contd.) 11 in CIT Vs. Harprasad and Co. P. Ltd (1975) 99 ITR 118 and followed in Reliance Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. CIT (1979) 120 ITR 921. After elaborate and detailed discussion, this Court held with reference to the charging provisions of statute that the expression "income" should be understood to include losses. The expression "profits and gains" refers to positive income whereas "losses" represent negative profit or in other words minus income.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 253 - R S Pathak - Full Document

Commr.Of Income Tax-I,Ahmedabad vs Gold Coin Health Food Pvt.Ltd on 18 August, 2008

no application to the facts of the case and the question of law projected stands squarely answered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee in Gold Coin (supra) as a result thereof, appeal by Revenue stands hereby allowed. Impugned order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and confirmed by Division Bench are hereby set aside and quashed. The Revenue, therefore, would be at liberty to proceed further against the Assessee on merits in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 298 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next