Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Meenakshi Mills, Madurai vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Madras on 26 September, 1956
11. It would, thus, be seen that both the authorities, referred to above, do support the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellant before me also could not cite any ruling taking a different view and supporting the observations of the trial Court. As at present advised, therefore, I would affirm the finding of the lower Appellate Court on this point.
Jyotish Thakur And Ors. vs Tarakant Jha And Ors. on 11 September, 1962
17. Similarly, in a Supreme Court decision in Jyotish Thakur v. Tarakant Jha, AIR 1963 SC 605, it was observed:
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 10 in East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
Ln. Sm. Ramasamy Chettiar And Anr. vs Adaikkammai Alias Paripoornam on 9 December, 1959
In Ramaswamy Chettiar v. Adaikkammai, AIR 1960 Mad 341, Ramaswami, J., after referring to a number of decisions, at page 343 observed:--
Reoti Saran vs Hargu Lal on 1 November, 1963
23. Reference was then made to a Bench decision of the Allahabad High Court in Reoti Saran v. Hargu Lal, AIR 1964 All 542.
Bhoori Lal vs Gehri Lal on 18 October, 1965
21. Learned counsel also referred to a Single Bench decision of the Rajasthan High Court in Bhoori Lal v. Gehri Lal, AIR 1967 Raj 22, where it was observed:
1