Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.29 seconds)
State vs Bhola Prasad @ Abhishek on 23 October, 2024 cites

State Of Madhya Pradesh & Anr vs Bhola @ Bhairon Prasad Raghuvanshi on 6 February, 2003

1. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that on 12.05.2019 around 7:45 PM in front of O & P Pocket, Dilshad Garden, Poonam Joshi (hereinafter referred as "the complainant") was going towards her mother's house when a boy came on scooty and snatched her bag/wallet containing Rs 4,000/-, ATM Card, Credit Card, ID Cards and CGHS forms etc and ran towards Dilshad Colony. The complainant called on 100 1 of 6 State vs Bhola Prasad @ Abhishek; FIR 318/2019 CR No.6849/2019 number and informed the police. Bhola Prasad @ Abhishek was apprehended in another FIR, made disclosure in the present case and was accordingly arrested (hereinafter referred as "the accused"). The case property could not be recovered. Thus, FIR was registered with respect to the allegations made by the complainant against the accused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 45 - Full Document

Rohtash Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 29 May, 2013

9. Herein, it is pertinent to note that under Indian law, the evidence of hostile witnesses is not discarded completely. The legal maxim falsus in uno falsus in ombnibus i.e. false in one thing, false in everything is not applicable in India. The scope of evidentiary value of hostile witnesses has been delineated by the Page 3 of 6 Digitally signed by AISHWARYA AISHWARYA SINGH SINGH KASHYAP KASHYAP Date: 2024.10.23 16:32:14 +0530 State vs Bhola Prasad @ Abhishek; FIR 318/2019 CR No.6849/2019 Hon'ble Apex Court in Rohtash Kumar vs State of Haryana1 holding as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 406 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next