Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)

Deokinandan Prasad vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 4 May, 1971

6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Deokinandan Prasad Vs. State of Bihar., [1971] Suppl. SCR 634 held that pension is not bounty payable at the sweet will and pleasure of the Govt.; instead the right to pension is valuable right vested in a Govt. servant. The applicant who has rendered service for so many years is entitled for pension and cannot be withheld for any ground whatsoever. In the present case, signature of his wife is not there and he has not submitted pension papers within time. It is only an official obligation to complete formality within a prescribed time but that cannot again deprive the legitimate right of getting pension. With Page 3 of 4 OA 1120/2019 regard to non-signature on pension papers by his wife, it is not a ground for denying the pension as there is matrimonial dispute which can be decided in due course of time. With regards to the contention that there is Court Attachment Order amounting to Rs.14,95,333, be that as it may, though this Tribunal is not in agreement that the Civil Court has jurisdiction for attaching pension, since this order is passed by a Court, let it be challenged before the appropriate forum.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 429 - C A Vaidyialingam - Full Document
1