Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.33 seconds)
Sujit Pateker vs Directorate Of Enforcement And Anr on 16 July, 2025 cites

Niranjan Lakhumal Hiranandani S/O Late ... vs Central Bureau Of Investigation And Anr on 11 April, 2018

31. The learned counsel has further relied on the decision of the Bombay High Court in Niranjan Lakhumal Hiranandani v. CBI & Anr., 2018 SCC OnLine Bom 1116, contending that this Court held that participation in an act involving submission of questionable 16 ::: Uploaded on - 16/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 02/08/2025 03:50:09 ::: ba3-2025 with ia2415-2025 & ia2438-2025-Final.doc documents, without active involvement in their fabrication, would not suffice to attract penal liability under Sections 465 to 471 IPC.
Bombay High Court Cites 71 - Cited by 1 - V Tehsilramani - Full Document

Shri Sukhbir Singh Badal vs Balwant Singh Khera on 28 April, 2023

In furtherance of this line of argument, reliance is also placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in Sukhbir Singh Badal v. Balwant Singh Khera & Ors., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 522, wherein the Court reiterated that criminal provisions relating to forgery and use of forged documents require a specific mens rea and cannot be invoked mechanically in absence of foundational allegations and material. In the present case, the prosecution, according to the learned counsel, has not identified any single document which has been forged or executed by the applicant in a false name, or on behalf of a fictitious entity, nor is there any evidence to show that the document was altered post-execution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 1 - M R Shah - Full Document

Shankerlal Vishwakarma vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 November, 1990

Similarly, in Shankarlal Vishwakarma v. State, 1992 MPLJ 791 and Motisinh Gambhirsinh v. State, 1961 SCC OnLine Guj 2, the High Courts have consistently held that the offence of forgery cannot be inferred merely on the basis of passive association or by holding a position in a firm where documents were allegedly misused, unless there is specific evidence attributing the act of forgery to the accused.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next