Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)Sheo Nandan Paswan vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 20 December, 1986
In para 15 of the judgment of Sheo Nandan Paswan vs State of Bihar & others (supra), the Apex Court observing that:-
Rajendra Kumar Jain Etc vs State Through Special Police ... on 2 May, 1980
The scope of Section 321 Cr.P.C. was considered time again by the Apex Court and in the case of Sheo Nandan Paswan vs State of Bihar & others (supra), the five judges Bench of Apex Court also agreed with the legal position flowing from Section 321 as has been explained in the case of Rajendra Kumar Jain Vs. State through Special Police Establishment, and held that:-
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Rahul Agarwal vs Rakesh Jain & Anr on 18 January, 2005
In the case of Rahul Agarwal Vs. Rakesh Jain, (2005) 2 SCC 377 OR 2005 Criminal Law Journal 963 (mentioned by ADGC in application 57/B). Hon'ble the Apex Court, setting aside the order of High Court, allowing withdrawal from prosecution, held that:-
Section 121A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sri Yerneni Raja Ramchander @ Rajababu vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 4 August, 2009
In the case of Yerneni Raja Ramchander @ Rajababu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & other, 2009 (15) SCC 604, where appellant an MLA was being prosecuted under Sections 420, 463, 467, 468, 471 read with 120B I.P.C. for obtaining huge amount on the basis of false and fabricated medical bills, petition for withdrawal from prosecution was moved on the ground of acceptance of apology tendered by him as well as due to refund of misappropriated amount on the recommendations of Ethics Committee. The Apex Court held that:-