Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
In Associate
Builders' case, it is held that, "An award can be
said to be against justice only when it shocks the
AS.109/2014
42
conscience of the court". It is further held that, "it
is settled law that where: (i) a finding is based on
no evidence, or (ii) an Arbitral Tribunal takes into
account something irrelevant to the decision which
it arrives at; or (iii) ignores vital evidence in
arriving at its decision, such decision would
necessarily be perverse". It is, therefore, award in
respect of Claim No.1(a) and (b) needs to be set
aside, as the same is passed against justice and in
contravention of Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 and terms of the contract.
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs Saw Pipes Ltd on 17 April, 2003
32) In ONGC Ltd. Vs. Saw Pipes Ltd., [(2003)
5 SCC 705], the Hon'ble Supreme Court was
pleased to hold that :
M/S.Sharma & Associates Contractors ... vs Progressive Constructions Ltd. on 27 January, 2017
35) In Sharma and Associates Contractors
Private Limited Vs. Progressive Constructions
Limited, [(2017) 5 SCC 743], the Hon'be
Supreme court was pleased to hold that :
Section 31 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
1