Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.34 seconds)

Messrs. Keystone Constructions vs State Bank Of India on 8 October, 2013

The view taken by the Bombay High Court in M/s Vinay's case (supra), was followed by another Division Bench of the same Court in Keystone Constructions vs. State Bank of India and others, CWP No. 1382 of 2013, decided on 08.10.2013 and thereafter followed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Satnam Agri Products Ltd. and others vs. Union of India and others, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7158 of 2014 decided on 10.12.2014.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 4 - S J Vazifdar - Full Document

M/S Satnam Agri Products Ltd. & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 December, 2014

The view taken by the Bombay High Court in M/s Vinay's case (supra), was followed by another Division Bench of the same Court in Keystone Constructions vs. State Bank of India and others, CWP No. 1382 of 2013, decided on 08.10.2013 and thereafter followed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Satnam Agri Products Ltd. and others vs. Union of India and others, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7158 of 2014 decided on 10.12.2014.
Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 3 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Narayan Chandra Ghosh vs Uco Bank & Ors on 18 March, 2011

13. Now, coming to the judgments relied upon by the petitioner, it was noticed that in none of the aforesaid cases have the provisions of Section 18 (1) of the Act held to be directory or not mandatory for entertaining any appeal. Rather, it is after taking into consideration the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Narayan Chandra Ghosh (supra) that it was held that the principles laid down therein would not apply to a case when there is no amount ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:14:45 :::HCHP 8 due or where more than the due amount has already been realised by .
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 111 - D K Jain - Full Document

M/S.Vinay Container Services Pvt.Ltd vs Axis Bank on 16 November, 2010

The view taken by the Bombay High Court in M/s Vinay's case (supra), was followed by another Division Bench of the same Court in Keystone Constructions vs. State Bank of India and others, CWP No. 1382 of 2013, decided on 08.10.2013 and thereafter followed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Satnam Agri Products Ltd. and others vs. Union of India and others, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7158 of 2014 decided on 10.12.2014.
1