Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors on 19 December, 2008
The relevant portion of Roop Singh Negi (supra) is as follows:
State Of U.P. & Ors vs Saroj Kumar Sinha on 2 February, 2010
The procedure required to be followed in disciplinary proceedings in order to maintain transparency and fairness have also been discussed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in various other judgments such as Roop Singh Negi versus Punjab National bank and others MANU/SC/8456/2008:(2009) 1 SCC (L & S) 398 and State of Uttar Pradesh and others versus Saroj Kumar Sinha reported in (2010) 2 SCC 772.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ram Sajeevan Yadav vs State Of U.P. on 30 July, 2019
Learned counsel has placed reliance on the judgment and order dated 28.03.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.2248 (SS) of 2011 (Ram Sajeevan Yadav vs. State of U.P & Ors.) passed in similar circumstances in which it was held that Assistant Teacher such as the petitioner would be covered by the U.P. Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973 and that the Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules shall also be applicable upon Assistant Teacher such as petitioner including the Rules of 1999. It was further held that it has been submitted that in view of aforesaid judgment, opposite parties were obligated to hold disciplinary inquiry proceeding and could not have terminated the services of petitioner in such a cursory manner as has been done.
1