Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.24 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Jugendra Singh vs State Of U.P on 29 May, 2012
In Jugendra Singh vs. State of UP, (2012) 6 SCC 297,
Hon'ble Apex Court has held:-
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Gian Chand on 1 May, 2001
In State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Gian Chand, (2001) 6
SCC 71, it was held that conviction for an offence of rape can be based
on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix corroborated by medical
evidence and other circumstances such as the report of chemical
examination etc. if the same is found to be natural, trustworthy and worth
being relied on.
Vijay @ Chinee vs State Of M.P on 27 July, 2010
In the case of Vijay @ Chinee vs. State of Madhya
Pradesh, (2010) 8 SCC 191, it was held that the statement of the
prosecutrix, if found to be worthy of credence and reliable, requires no
corroboration. The Court may convict the accused on the sole testimony
of the prosecutrix. Paras- 9 to 14 of the judgment are reproduced as
under:-