Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.26 seconds)Section 35 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Sanjeeva Reddi vs Johanputra Reddi on 30 August, 1971
AIR1972AP373 . The expression "for any purpose" has been the
subject-matter of consideration under the said judgment. It has
been held as under:
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Nalamuru Nadipi Subbanna vs Kataru Chennamma And Ors. on 8 April, 2002
7.2. He would further submit that at any rate these documents
can be relied on for collateral purposes to establish that there was an
understanding on respective extents of property purchased by them and
therefore the Court below has rightly over ruled the objection.
7.3. Learned counsel for respondent placed reliance on the
decision of this Court in NALAMURU NADIPI SUBBANNA Vs KATARU
CHENNAMMA and PUDI BALRAJU Vs JALLU ANNAPOORNA .
Pudi Balraju vs Jallu Annapoorna on 1 August, 2003
7.2. He would further submit that at any rate these documents
can be relied on for collateral purposes to establish that there was an
understanding on respective extents of property purchased by them and
therefore the Court below has rightly over ruled the objection.
7.3. Learned counsel for respondent placed reliance on the
decision of this Court in NALAMURU NADIPI SUBBANNA Vs KATARU
CHENNAMMA and PUDI BALRAJU Vs JALLU ANNAPOORNA .
Rachakonda Ramakoteswara Rao And Ors. vs Manohar Fuel Centre And Anr. on 28 August, 2002
In support of his contentions, he placed reliance on decision
of this Court in RACHAKONDA RAMAKOTESHWARA RAO Vs
MANOHAR FUEL CENTRE and decision of Supreme Court in YELLUPU
UMA MAHESHWARI Vs BUDDA JAGADHEESWARA RAO .
1