Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.23 seconds)Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 15 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March, 2007
60. The above said view of this Court is fortified by a larger Bench
decision of the Supreme Court in Samar Ghosh, supra, wherein qua long
separation, it has been emphatically held as under:
Savitri Pandey vs Prem Chandra Pandey on 8 January, 2002
34. Citing the decision in Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra Pandey,
supra, the learned counsel for the respondent contended that remarriage by
divorced person during pendency of appeal filed after expiry of limitation
period is at the risk of the party entering into such remarriage and its
validity is entirely dependent on the outcome of the pending appeal.
Rishikesh Sharma vs Saroj Sharma on 21 November, 2006
Admittedly, the appellant and the
respondent have been living separately for more than 17 years and it will not
be possible for the parties to live together and there is no purpose in
compelling the parties to live together in matrimony (Rishikesh Sharma v.
Saroj Sharma, (2007) 2 SCC 263). The daughter of the appellant and the
respondent is aged about 24 years and her custody is not in issue before us.
In the peculiar facts of this case and in order to do complete justice
between the parties, we allow the appeal in exercise of our power under
Article 142 of the Constitution.?
Section 9 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Sukhendu Das vs Rita Mukherjee on 9 October, 2017
In the decision cited by the learned Senior Counsel for the
appellant in Sukhendu Das v. Rita Mukherjee, supra, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
held as under:
Vishnu Dutt Sharma vs Manju Sharma on 27 February, 2009
In Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Manju Sharma, supra, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court held: