Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.83 seconds)
Janak Singh vs Chief District Medical Officer on 26 December, 2008 cites

S. Ramachandra Raju vs State Of Orissa on 31 August, 1994

24. Before passing the impugned order, it was mandatory for the respondents to examine the entire service record of the petitioner, more particularly, latest one which, which would form foundation for the opinion. I am fortified in my view by a judgement of the apex court reported as S. Ramachandra Raju Vs. State of Orissa, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 424, wherein it has been held that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 166 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

M.S. Bindra vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 September, 1998

5. These tests came to be discussed by the apex court and this court (both single and Letters Patent Bench) and other High Courts in numerous cases reported as Baldev Raj Chandra V. Union of India, 1980(4) SCC 321, Baldev Raj Chandra V. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 70, H.C. Gagri V. State of Haryana, AIR 1987 SC 65, Brij Mohan Singh Chopra Vs State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 948, Baidyanath Mahapatra V. State of Orissa, AIR 1989 SC 2218, Ram Ekbal Sharma V. State of Bihar, 1990(3) SCC 504, Union of India V. Dulal Dutt, 1993 (2) SCC 179, S.Ramachandra Raju Vs. State of Orissa, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 424, State of J&K V. Jia Lal Gupta, 1994 SLJ 24, Chief General Manager, SBI V. Suresh Chandra Behera, AIR 1995 SCC 1745, K. Kandaswamy Vs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 277, Allahabad Bank Officers Association V. Allahabad Bank, 1996(4) SCC 504, M.S. Bindra V. Union of India, 1998(7) SCC 310, M.S. Bindra v. Union of India, AIR 1998, SCC 3058, State of Gujarat V. Suryakant Chunilal Shah, 1999(1) SCC 529, State of Gujrat V. Umedbhai M. Patel, AIR 2001 SC 1109, State of U.P V. Chater Sen, 2005(9) SCC 592, Pritam Singh V. Union of India, 2005(9) SCC 748, Ashok Kumar Jain Vs. State of J&K & ors. LPA Nos.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 190 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Col. J. N. Sinha And Anr on 12 August, 1970

2The test in such cases is public interest as laid down by this Court in Union of India v. J.N. Sinha, (1971) 1 SCR 791: (AIR 1971 SC 40). It does not appear that there was any material on the basis of which the State Government could have formed an opinion that it was in public interest to compulsorily retire the appellant at the age of 57 years. There was really no justification for his compulsory retirement in public interest. The impugned order of compulsory retirement of the appellant under R 3.25(d) of the Rules must therefore be struck down as being arbitrary. ..
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 460 - K S Hegde - Full Document

Baikuntha Nath Das And Anr vs Chief Distt. Medical Officer, Baripada ... on 19 February, 1992

17. Admittedly, the petitioner came to be promoted to the selection grade in the year 2004. How the allegations of the year 1997-98 can be made basis for passing the impugned order of compulsory retirement. The apex court in AIR 1992 SC 1020, Baikuntha Nath Das case supra, while laying down the tests, has held that if an officer/employee is promoted, any adverse entry existing in his service records loses its sting. It is apt to reproduce para (iv) of the tests hereunder:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 579 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Allahabad Bank Officers Association ... vs Allahabad Bank And Others on 1 May, 1996

5. These tests came to be discussed by the apex court and this court (both single and Letters Patent Bench) and other High Courts in numerous cases reported as Baldev Raj Chandra V. Union of India, 1980(4) SCC 321, Baldev Raj Chandra V. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 70, H.C. Gagri V. State of Haryana, AIR 1987 SC 65, Brij Mohan Singh Chopra Vs State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 948, Baidyanath Mahapatra V. State of Orissa, AIR 1989 SC 2218, Ram Ekbal Sharma V. State of Bihar, 1990(3) SCC 504, Union of India V. Dulal Dutt, 1993 (2) SCC 179, S.Ramachandra Raju Vs. State of Orissa, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 424, State of J&K V. Jia Lal Gupta, 1994 SLJ 24, Chief General Manager, SBI V. Suresh Chandra Behera, AIR 1995 SCC 1745, K. Kandaswamy Vs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 277, Allahabad Bank Officers Association V. Allahabad Bank, 1996(4) SCC 504, M.S. Bindra V. Union of India, 1998(7) SCC 310, M.S. Bindra v. Union of India, AIR 1998, SCC 3058, State of Gujarat V. Suryakant Chunilal Shah, 1999(1) SCC 529, State of Gujrat V. Umedbhai M. Patel, AIR 2001 SC 1109, State of U.P V. Chater Sen, 2005(9) SCC 592, Pritam Singh V. Union of India, 2005(9) SCC 748, Ashok Kumar Jain Vs. State of J&K & ors. LPA Nos.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 117 - G T Nanavati - Full Document

The State Of Gujarat & Anr vs Suryakant Chunilal Shah on 3 December, 1998

5. These tests came to be discussed by the apex court and this court (both single and Letters Patent Bench) and other High Courts in numerous cases reported as Baldev Raj Chandra V. Union of India, 1980(4) SCC 321, Baldev Raj Chandra V. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 70, H.C. Gagri V. State of Haryana, AIR 1987 SC 65, Brij Mohan Singh Chopra Vs State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 948, Baidyanath Mahapatra V. State of Orissa, AIR 1989 SC 2218, Ram Ekbal Sharma V. State of Bihar, 1990(3) SCC 504, Union of India V. Dulal Dutt, 1993 (2) SCC 179, S.Ramachandra Raju Vs. State of Orissa, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 424, State of J&K V. Jia Lal Gupta, 1994 SLJ 24, Chief General Manager, SBI V. Suresh Chandra Behera, AIR 1995 SCC 1745, K. Kandaswamy Vs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 277, Allahabad Bank Officers Association V. Allahabad Bank, 1996(4) SCC 504, M.S. Bindra V. Union of India, 1998(7) SCC 310, M.S. Bindra v. Union of India, AIR 1998, SCC 3058, State of Gujarat V. Suryakant Chunilal Shah, 1999(1) SCC 529, State of Gujrat V. Umedbhai M. Patel, AIR 2001 SC 1109, State of U.P V. Chater Sen, 2005(9) SCC 592, Pritam Singh V. Union of India, 2005(9) SCC 748, Ashok Kumar Jain Vs. State of J&K & ors. LPA Nos.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 114 - Full Document
1   2 Next