Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.35 seconds)Indian Companies Act, 1913
Section 86 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Laxmi Engineering Works vs P.S.G. Industrial Institute on 4 April, 1995
In
this regard he has placed reliance upon judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in
Laxmi Engineering Works Vs. PSG Industrial Institute, 1995 (3) SCC 583;
Cheema Engineering Services Vs. Rajan Singh (1997) 1 SCC 131, in which it
was held that burden to proof purpose of the purchasing goods or availing
services is upon buyer of such goods or services.
M/S. Cheema Engineering Services vs Rajan Singh on 1 November, 1996
In
this regard he has placed reliance upon judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in
Laxmi Engineering Works Vs. PSG Industrial Institute, 1995 (3) SCC 583;
Cheema Engineering Services Vs. Rajan Singh (1997) 1 SCC 131, in which it
was held that burden to proof purpose of the purchasing goods or availing
services is upon buyer of such goods or services.
Maruti Udyog Limited vs Hasmukh Lakshmichand on 26 May, 2009
M/s. Gannayak Cars Private Limited & Ors. 14/11/2025
raised in the complaint mainly pertains to tyres manufactured by the opposite
party No.3 M/s. Micheline India Pvt. Ltd., the opposite party No.2
manufacturer of the car is not liable under any circumstances. He has further
argued that Hon'ble National Commission in Maruti Udyog Limited Vs.
Hasmukh Lakshmichand & Anr., III (2009) CPJ 229 (NC) has defined
manufacturing defect as a defect due to which the vehicle cannot function
and results in a complete and total breakdown and it was further observed
that the vehicle in that case was in running condition and is being used by the
complainant on regular basis and it shows that there was no manufacturing
defect in the vehicle.
Honda Cars India Limited vs Sudesh Berry on 12 November, 2021
In this regard reliance is placed upon judgement
of Hon'ble Apex Court in Honda Cars India Limited Vs. Sudesh Berry, Civil
Appeal No.6802 of 2021, order dated 12.11.2021. He has further argued that
in fact no cause of action arises in favour of the complainant against the
Partly allowed. Page 15 of 25
Complaint Nos.
Section 47 in Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Entire Act]
Crompton Greaves Limited & Anr. vs Daimler Chrysler India Privte Limited & ... on 8 July, 2016
Hon'ble Apex Court in the above judgement clearly laid down that,
facts of each case has to be examined keeping in mind that transaction, in
reference to which the claim has been raised, has any close and direct nexus
with the profit generating activity. In the facts of the present case the
complainant has contended that the car in question was purchased for
personal use of its Director and there is no close and direct nexus between the
said car and ordinary profit generation activities of the Complainant
company. Hon'ble National Commission in Crompton Greaves Limited &
Anr. Vs. Daimler Chrysler India Private Limited & Ors., CC No.51 of 2006,
decided on 08.7.2016 has held the following:-