Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.17 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Chairman Madappa vs M. N. Mahanthadevaru And Others on 11 October, 1965
15. The dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chairman
Madappa 's case [cited supra] squarely applies to the facts of the present case
where there was a resolution passed by the trust to sell its properties and even
though the learned Principal District Munsif lacked jurisdiction to grant
permission to sell the trust properties, yet, the sales made pursuant to the
resolution by the trust, cannot be held to be invalid and also the fact that the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
12 of 15
C.R.P.No.3482 of 2024
revision petitioner has come to the court with unclean hands, and he has come
to the court with the present revision only to vindicate his personal rights with
some ulterior hidden motive, he is not entitled to any relief in the revision.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 92 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Indian Trusts Act, 1882
L. Savithri vs P. Selvaraj on 27 April, 2004
5. Mr.A.Muthukumar would place much reliance on the judgment of this
court in the case of J.Savithri v. Selvaraj, (2023) 6 MLJ 70 in support of his
contention that in a collateral proceedings , if it comes to the notice of the High
Court that the judgment is contrary to law, the High Court under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India, is empowered to set aside such a decree.
1