Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.80 seconds)Cadila Healthcare Limited vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited on 26 March, 2001
14. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila
Pharmaceuticals 2001 (5) SCC 73 observed as:
"16. The ratio of the above noted judgments is that once the
court of first instance exercises its discretion to grant or refuse to
grant relief of temporary injunction and the said exercise of
discretion is based upon objective consideration of the material
placed before the court and is supported by cogent reasons, the
appellate court will be loath to interfere simply because on a de
novo consideration of the matter it is possible for the appellate
court to form a different opinion on the issues of prima facie
case, balance of convenience, irreparable injury and equity."
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1