Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.21 seconds)

Ananda Behera And Another vs The State Of Orissa And Another on 27 October, 1955

8. Lastly, comes the question as to what relief can be granted in the application of the petitioner. The learned Advocate-General argues that even if some rights of the petitioner have been affected, an application for a high prerogative writ was not the proper remedy. He points out that in Ananda Behera's case (G) (supra), Bose J., held that if the State was wrong in its attitude, that might give rise to a suit against it for damages for breach of contract or possibly to a right to sue for specific performance. That of course presupposes that the right claimed by the petitioner was in respect of anything in the nature of a "profit a Prendre".
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 61 - V Bose - Full Document

Maharajadhiraja Bahadur Of Darbhanga vs Commissioner Of Agricultural ... on 15 May, 1951

4. I think that it will be eminently useful to consider a decision of this Court viz., Maharajadhiraj Bahadur of Darbhanga v. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax Act, West Bengal, . Fortunately, Chakravartti, C. J,, was considering there, a document in respect of this very forest, and couched almost in identical terms. The learned Chief Justice had to consider the question as to the kind of interest which devolved on the contractor who took the lease. The learned Chief Justice stated as follows :
Calcutta High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 22 - Full Document
1   2 Next