Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.22 seconds)Section 37 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 29 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Tofan Singh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 October, 2020
In Ranjit Singh
(supra) and Soni Singh @ Chamkaur Sahib (supra) it has been held by this
Court that where there were multiple FIRs against an accused over a period of
time then, even though he had been named in a disclosure statement, he was not
entitled to the concession of bail.
Satpal Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 27 March, 2018
I have heard counsel for both the sides at length.
Admittedly, the petitioner in the present case is named
in the disclosure statement of the arrested accused.
Subsequently thereto 3Kgs of Poppy Husk was recovered at
his instance which is a non commercial quantity. It may be
relevant to mention here that limitations to the grant of bail
under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are in addition to those
prescribed under Cr.PC or any other law inforce on the grant
of bail as has been set out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Satpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2018(5) RCR (Criminal)