Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)

Inspector Prem Chand vs Govt. Of N.C.T. Of Delhi And Others on 5 April, 2007

Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has strenuously argued that the punishment of dismissal imposed upon the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case cannot hold good as the only allegation against the petitioner which stood duly proved was having been negligent in filling up the TA/DA claim forms and the same cannot be construed to fall within the expression of "gravest act of misconduct". Heavy reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Inspector Prem Chand V. Government of NCT of Delhi & others 2007 (2) SCT 650 to contend that the act of negligence could not per se be taken as misconduct. Counsel has further argued that under Rule 16.2 of the Kaur Harjeet 2013.09.26 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No. 23398 of 2011 -3- Punjab Police Rules, 1934, it was incumbent upon the Punishing Authority to have taken into consideration petitioner's unblemished service record of 12 years as also his claim to pension.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 226 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1