Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.30 seconds)National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Smt. Pushpa Rana And Ors. on 20 December, 2007
In National Insurance Co. vs. Pushpa
Rana 2009 ACJ 287 Delhi, it was laid down that completion of
investigation and filing of charge sheet are sufficient proof of
negligence of the driver of the offending vehicle.
Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. vs Jaibir Singh & Ors. on 8 January, 2021
In accordance with the orders dated 08.02.2019 passed by
the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in FAO no. 842/2003 in Rajesh
Tyagi and others Vs. Jaibir Singh and others, Mr. Rajan Singh,
Assistant General Manager has been appointed as Nodal Officer
of SBI having Phone no. 022-22741336/9414048606 and e-mail
ID [email protected]. In case of any assistance or non
compliance, the aforesaid Nodal Officer may be contacted to. A
copy of this order be sent by e-mail to the aforesaid Nodal
Officer of the aforesaid bank by the Ahlmad of the Court
immediately in accordance with the directions of the Hon'ble
High Court as contained in the orders dated 07.12.2018.
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Parmeshwari vs Amir Chand & Ors on 28 January, 2011
MACT No: 378/19 Master Sartaj @ Yahiya Ansari vs. Sarvesh Kumar & anr. P.No. 4 of 23 ss
Reliance is placed upon decision in Bimla Devi & ors. vs.
Himachal Road Transport Corporation & ors. (2009) 13 SC
535, in Parmeshwari vs. Amir Chand & ors., 2011 (1) SCR
1096 and National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pushpa Rana,
2009 ACJ 287, wherein it has been held that the negligence has
to be decided on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities
and a holistic view has to be taken.
A.V.Padma & Ors vs R.Venugopal & Ors on 27 January, 2012
26. At this stage, it is relevant to the refer to the judgment of
A. V. Padma & Ors. Vs., R. Venugopal & Ors. (2012) 3
Supreme Court Cases 378:
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Kamlesh & Ors. on 9 August, 2017
12. The driver of the offending vehicle has not entered the
witness box or raised any defence to negate or refute the
allegations of rash and negligent driving. It may further be noted
that in Cholamandlam insurance company Ltd. Vs. Kamlesh
2009 (3) AD Delhi 310, it was held that if driver of offending
vehicle does not enter the witness box, an adverse inference can
be drawn against him. In the present case also, driver did not
enter into the witness box to controvert the claim of petitioner or
even to explain circumstances of accident.
Erudhaya Priya vs State Express Transport Corporation ... on 27 July, 2020
20. Having regard to the prevailing rate of interest and
the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, including in
the case of Erudhaya Priya vs State Express Transport
decided on 27 July, 2020, Civil Appeal Nos. 2811-2812 OF 2020
[Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.8495-8496 of 2018], which is three
Judges Bench judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court, such interest
@ 9% per annum is deemed fit and accordingly granted in the
present case.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Union Of India on 16 November, 2021
In compliance of directions issued vide order dated
16.11.2021 by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition
Civil No.534/2020 titled as Bajaj Allianz General Insurance
Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India the award amount shall be
deposited with State Bank of India, Saket Court Branch, New
Delhi by way of RTGS/NEFT/IMPS in account of MACT
SAVING ACCOUNT No. 00000042706875094, IFS Code
SBIN0014244 and MICR code 110002342 under intimation to
the Nazir in the prescribed format i.e. MCOP Number on the file
of (Claims Tribunal Name) Date of award, Compensation
Amount, Income Tax Deduction at Source, Bank Transaction
Reference No./Unique Transaction Reference (UTR) Number. In
turn, the State Bank of India, Saket Courts Branch shall receive
the deposited sum and capture the above information and furnish
a statement of account on a daily basis to the Nazir of this
Tribunal to reconcile the deposits of compensation and the
respective MCOPs towards which such deposits are made. On
such deposits being made, the insurance company shall submit a
letter to the Nazir of this Tribunal enclosing a copy of the said
bank advice, in prescribed format as above, as per which the
deposit made to the bank account of this Tribunal, to enable this
Tribunal to keep tab on the deposits made and the MCOPs for
which they were made. The Payment advice for remittance of
compensation is as under: