Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)
Shareef .K.K vs Kattappana Municipality on 19 July, 2022 cites

Marykutty George vs State Of Kerala on 12 April, 2005

22. Taking into account the legal position so laid down by this Court in Marykutty George (supra) and taking into consideration the facts and reasons based on which the Municipal authorities have taken a decision to extend the licence of meat stall and slaughter house, of the existing licensees, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the extension granted by the Municipal authorities.
Kerala High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 6 - P R Raman - Full Document

Elektron Lighting Systems Pvt Ltd And ... vs Shah Investments Financials ... on 20 November, 2015

10. The counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the Honourable Apex Court has considered the issue of distribution of State largesse in Elektron Lighting Systems Private Limited and another v. Shah Investments Financial Developments and Consultants Private Limited and others [(2015) 15 SCC 137] and held that award of contract without inviting tenders is unjustifiable. A statutory body and instrumentality of State should act fairly by making the State largesse open to all eligible citizens to submit their offers.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 23 - P C Pant - Full Document

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.. vs Shashi Prabha Shukla . on 15 December, 2017

11. The counsel also relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in Indian Oil Corporation Limited and others v. Shashi Prabha Shukla and another [(2018) 12 SCC 85] to contend that the power of public authorities are essentially different from private persons. A man making his will may subject to any rights of his dependants, dispose of his W.P(C) Nos. 7284 and 13482 of 2022 8 property just as he may wish. But, a public authority can exercise its powers only reasonably and in good faith and upon lawful and relevant grounds of public interest. In the present case, when there were offers for obtaining licence with an enhancement of 15% of the existing fee, the Municipal authorities committed a grave error in extending the existing licensees for a far lesser fee. The action of the Municipal authorities is not in public interest.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 25 - A Roy - Full Document

K.M. Khadeeja vs The Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative ... on 4 August, 2015

8. The counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.13482 of 2022 pointed out that the extension of the licence period was not included as an Agenda in the Municipal Council Meeting held on 18.02.2022. The conduct of the Municipal authorities in extending the licence of the existing licensees without there having an Agenda, offends the judgment of this Court in Manojkumar K.M and others v. Joint Registrar of Co- operative Societies (General), Kannur and another [2018 (1) KHC 717].
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A Narendran - Full Document
1