Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)Bishnu Priya Bhoi And Ors. And ... vs State Of Orissa And Ors. on 20 October, 1995
In the aforesaid judgment, the word 'locality' has been described to be a smaller identified place than local area and not as the exact place or premises, in which the exclusive privilege proposed to be granted is to operate, and it has been held in the judgment that both the local area and locality have to be mentioned in the public notice in Form A so that objections can be made protesting the grant of privilege in the locality as well as the local area. The judgment of this Court in Sarat Kumar Sahoo and Anr. v. Collector, Cuttack and Anr. (supra) has been followed in the Liberation Education and Action for Development (LEAD), through its Secretary and Ors. v. State of Orissa and Ors. (supra) and it has been held therein that not only the local area but also the locality in which the exclusive privilege is to operate is to be mentioned in the public notice inviting objections.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1