Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)Punjab Urban Planning And Development ... vs Gian Singh [Alongwith Revision ... on 14 August, 2003
18. It was further contended that the Forum has no jurisdiction to go
into the correctness of the demand and the composition fee and extension fee
and the order is liable to be set aside. It was contended that for the violation
committed while constructing the 2nd floor and 3rd floor of the said SCF, the
composition fee was demanded to the tune of Rs.62,370/- and there is no
illegality in the same and all the dues have been paid without raising any
protest and the order under appeal is liable to be set aside on this ground. He
has relied upon "HUDA Vs Sunita", (2005) 2 Supreme Court Cases-479
and "Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority Vs Punjab
First Appeal No.707 of 2010 7
Khapatkar Sangh", Revision Petition No.3107 of 2005 decided on
16.11.2006 by the Hon'ble National Commission.
Section 12 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977
1