Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.34 seconds)Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Anakapalla Co-Operative Agricultural ... vs Workmen on 23 October, 1962
"17. The effect of Section 25-FF which is explained by this
Court in Anakapalli Cooperative Agricultural and Industrial
Society Limited v. Workmen [AIR 1963 SC 1489 : (1963) 1
Supp SCR 730 : 1962 (2) Lab LJ 621] is, so far as it is relevant,
::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2024 20:32:04 :::CIS
16
as follows: (i) the first part of the section postulates that on a
transfer of the ownership or management of an undertaking, the
employment of workmen engaged by the said undertaking
.
M. P. Irrigation Karamchari Sangh vs The State Of M. P. And Anr on 27 February, 1985
As has
been held in M.P. Irrigation Karamchari Sangh case [(1985) 2 SCC
103 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 409 : (1985) 2 SCR 1019] , there may be
exceptional cases in which the State Government may, on a proper
examination of the demand, come to a conclusion that the demands
are either perverse or frivolous and do not merit a reference.
Further, the Government should be very slow to attempt an
examination of the demand with a view to declining reference and
courts will always be vigilant whenever the Government attempts to
usurp the powers of the Tribunal for adjudication of valid disputes,
and that to allow the Government to do so would be to render
Section 10 and Section 12(5) of the Act nugatory.
Shri Jai Singh S/O Shri vs State Of H.P. & Others on 30 March, 2022
29. Next question, which arises for consideration of this
Court is "whether Labour Commissioner without ascertaining the
correctness of the demand and existence of industrial dispute, if any,
could straightway make reference to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial
Tribunal". Answer to aforesaid question has been already answered in
case titled Jai Singh versus State of Himachal Pradesh, 2022 SCC
online HP 1020, wherein Full Bench of this Court having taken note
of various judgments passed by Hon'ble Apex Court, categorically
held that appropriate government in discharging the administrative
function of taking a decisions to make or refuse to make reference of
the industrial dispute under Section 10(1) of the Act, has to apply its
mind on relevant considerations and has not to act mechanically as a
post office.
Ram Avtar Sharma & Ors. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Anr. Etc on 11 April, 1985
36. Similarly, in case titled Avtar Sharma v. State of
Haryana, (1985) 3 SCC 189, Hon'ble Apex Court held that while
.
Telco Convoy Drivers Mazdoor Sangh & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 28 April, 1989
35. Reliance in this regard is placed upon the judgment
passed by Hon'ble Apex Court, in case titled Telco Convoy Driver's
Mazdoor Sangh v. State of Bihar, (1989) 3 SCC 271, wherein it has
been held as under: