Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.19 seconds)
Sher Singh And Ors vs B.O.R. And Ors on 4 September, 2023 cites

Smt. Tara Bai vs Vitthal Rao Ithova Rao Gaydhane 10 ... on 17 June, 2019

10. This Court also observes that the entire issue herein has already been settled by the Larger Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Tara & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (D.B.S.A.W. No. 185 of 2001 & Other Connected Matters, decided on (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 05:25:19 AM) [2023:RJ-JD:27778] (9 of 9) [CW-4176/1996] 15.07.2015), and the same was followed by this Court, in the afore-quoted judgment.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 12 - S Agrawal - Full Document

Tara & Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr. on 15 July, 2015

[2023:RJ-JD:27778] (6 of 9) [CW-4176/1996] "13. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and while keeping into consideration the judgment passed by Full Bench of this Hon'ble Court in Tara and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2015(3) RLW2721 (Raj.), this Court is of the opinion that once the land has been consistently recorded as a temple/deity/doli land and has been marked as a Khudkasht for the same and there is no independent Khatedar having its existence in the land record from the beginning then any right cannot aggrieve any person merely because in the Khudkasht or deity he was acting as a sub-tenant. The consistency in the land record reflects the land in question belonging to the doli/temple/deity the perpetual minor and the category being Khudkasht.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 32 - Cited by 172 - Full Document
1   2 Next