Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (3.66 seconds)Section 49 in U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 [Entire Act]
Rajeshwari vs Puran Indoria on 25 August, 2005
(4) Rajeshwari versus Puran Indoria, reported in (2005) 7 SCC 60.
Rajeshwar Thakur & Anr vs Bihar State Electricity Board & Ors on 16 May, 2008
In support of his submission he relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Rajeshwar and another versus Board of Revenue and others, reported in 1995 RD 441.
Karbalai Begum vs Mohd. Sayeed And Anr on 7 October, 1980
In support of his submission he relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Karbalai Begum versus Mohd.Sayeed and another, reported in 1980 RD 300 SC. In this case the Hon'ble Supreme Court has further held that it is well settled that unless there is an express provision barring a suit on the basis of title, the courts will not easily infer a bar of suit to establish the title of the parties.
Sher Singh & Ors vs Gamdoor Singh on 13 December, 1996
In support of this submission he cited a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Sher Singh and others versus Gamdoor Singh, reported in 1997(2 SCC 485.
M.L. Subbaraya Setty (Dead) By Lrs. And ... vs M.L. Nagappa Setty (Dead) By Lrs. And ... on 23 April, 2002
It is further stated that on mere severance of status of joint family, the character of any joint family property does not change with such severance. It retains the character of joint family property so long as the joint family property is in existence and is not partitioned amongst the co-sharers as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M.L.Subbaraya Setty versus M.L.Nagappa Setty, reported in 2002 (4) SC 743.
P.S. Sairam & Anr vs P.S. Rama Rao Pisey & Ors on 4 February, 2004
(1) P.S.Sairam and another versus P.S.Rama Rao Pissey and others, reported in (2004) 11 SCC 320.
Sita Ram vs Chhota Bhondey And Others on 9 October, 1990
In support of his submission he cited the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Sita Ram versus Chhota Bhondey and others, reported in AIR 1991 SC page 249, in which the Hon'ble Supreme court has held that declaration and adjudication of rights of tenure-holders in respect of land lying in the area covered by the notification under Section 4(2) of the Act and adjudication of any other right arising out of consolidation proceedings, and in regard to which a proceeding could or ought to have been taken under the Act, would cover adjudication of questions as to title in respect of the said lands. It is stated by him that it is not in dispute that the land in dispute was recorded exclusively in the name of the respondent's ancestors. The petitioner even being fully aware with the same, much less during the course of consolidation proceeding, did not make any attempt to get his name jointly recorded in the revenue record. By appropriate proceeding the answering respondent has been brought on record only as a legal representative, after the death of original tenant.
Kondiba Dagadu Kadam vs Savitkibai Sopan Gujar An Dors on 16 April, 1999
In support of his submission he cited the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Kondiba Dagadu Kadam versus Savitribai Sopan Gujar and others, reported in (1999) 3 SCC, page 722, Subhan Rao and others versus Parvathi Bai and others, reported in (2010) 10 SCC, page 235 and in the case of State of Himanchal Pradesh and another versus Sri Dutt (dead) by LRs. And others, reported in (2010) 10 SCC, page 68.