Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.20 seconds)Section 19 in The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 65 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 81 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Gujarat State Civil Supplies ... vs Mahakali Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Unit 2) on 31 October, 2022
the case, subject to such conditions as it deems necessary to
impose.”
10 In terms of Section 19, an application for setting aside an award of the
Facilitation Council cannot be entertained by any court unless the appellant
has deposited seventy-five per cent of the amount in terms of the award. In
view of the provisions of Section 18(4), where the Facilitation Council
proceeds to arbitrate upon a dispute, the provisions of the Act of 1996 are to
apply to the dispute as if it is in pursuance of an arbitration agreement under
sub-section (1) of Section 7 of that Act. Hence, the remedy which is provided
under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 would govern an award of the Facilitation
Council. However, there is a super added condition which is imposed by
Section 19 of MSMED Act 2006 to the effect that an application for setting
aside an award can be entertained only upon the appellant depositing with
the Council seventy-five per cent of the amount in terms of the award.
Section 19 has been introduced as a measure of security for enterprises for
whom a special provision is made in the MSMED Act by Parliament. In view of
the provisions of Section 18(4), the appellant had a remedy under Section 34
of the Act of 1996 to challenge the award which it failed to pursue.
11 In the judgment of this Court in Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation
Limited (supra), a two-Judge Bench of the Court has observed, in the course
of drawing its conclusions, that: