Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.41 seconds)

Smt. Dilboo (Dead) By Lrs. & Ors vs Smt. Dhanraji (Dead) And Ors on 12 September, 2000

30. I have also considered the decision in Dilboo (supra) relied upon by the applicants but find that the same is not applicable to the facts of the present case. In the said decision, the Apex Court found that there was no averment or proof as to how the suit could in the face of the existence of registered documents, be treated in time and therefore held that the plaintiff must fail. In the present case, the plaintiff has specifically averred that all the sisters were granted equal access to the suit property by defendant no.1 and therefore, they were under a bonafide belief that the suit property remained a joint property and it is only in June 2015 that she, for the first time, became aware about the existence of the instruments in favor of defendant no.1.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 90 - S N Variava - Full Document

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Of The ... vs Haji Abdulgafur Haji Hussenbhai on 18 March, 1971

In support of his plea that there was no such onus on the plaintiff to make inquiries about the existence of the documents, he places reliance on decisions of the Apex Court in Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn. v. Haji Abdulgafur Haji Hussenbhai, (1971) 1 SCC 757 , Uma Devi Nambair vs Thamarasseri (2022)7 SCC 90 and Tilakdhari Lal v. Khedan Lal, 1920 SCC OnLine PC 49.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 61 - I D Dua - Full Document
1   2 Next