Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.42 seconds)

Amar Mishra vs State Of Delhi on 23 September, 2011

29. Another Division Bench of this Court in Amar Mishra & Ors. v. State of Delhi, 2011 VIII AD(Delhi) 590, held that to complete the offence, there should be proof that the abducted person, was, after abduction, either killed, or injured, or was threatened with such acts, or the conduct CRL.A.237/2010 Page 14 of 16 of the abductors would result in reasonable apprehension of such consequence.
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 1 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Vishwanath Gupta vs State Of Uttaranchal on 21 March, 2007

"According to Section 364A, whoever kidnaps or abducts any person and keeps him in detention and threatens to cause death or hurt to such person and by his conduct gives rise to a reasonable apprehension that such person may be put to death or hurt, and claims a ransom and if death is caused then in that case the accused can be punished with death or imprisonment for life and also liable to pay fine.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 38 - Full Document
1