Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 40 (0.30 seconds)Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 415 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 418 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Alpic Finance Ltd vs P. Sadasivan And Anr on 16 February, 2001
15. On the Contrary, Ms. Soni Srivastava, learned
counsel for the Complainant would submit that the writ petitions filed
for quashing the FIR of Kotwali P. S. Case No. 27 of 2015 are not
maintainable inasmuch as they have been filed hastily without waiting
for the investigation to complete. She would submit that the
petitioners have chosen to delay the proceedings before the court
below by filing frivolous applications and as such the applications do
not deserve any consideration. She would further contend that merely
because there is civil remedy available to the Complainant, there is no
impediment in continuation of criminal proceedings and the
submission of the petitioners in this regard has got no merit as civil /
commercial transactions may also involve acts, which have sufficient
ingredients of cheating and as such the same would need to be dealt in
accordance with law separately in a properly instituted criminal
proceeding.
Rajesh Bajaj vs State Nct Of Delhi And Others on 12 March, 2000
59. There is no conflict with the ratio laid down by the
Supreme Court in Trisuns Chemical Industry vs. Rajesh Agarwal
and Rajesh Bajaj vs. State, NCT of Delhi (supra). However, in the
considered opinion of this Court, the said ratio would have no
application to the facts alleged in the complaint giving rise to these
four petitions.