Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.26 seconds)
Iqbal Singh & Ors vs Sunil Arora & Anr on 11 July, 2013 cites

Sarla Ahuja vs United India Insurance Company Ltd on 27 October, 1998

At this stage, it may be noticed that in a catena of judgments, it has been settled that the Revisional Court is not to interfere in the concurrent findings recorded by the Rent Controller as well as the CR No.2214 of 2011 (O&M) 19 Appellate Authority to arrive at a different finding. Reference can be made to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Shiv Sarup Gupta v. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta AIR 1999 SC 2507, Sarla Ahuja v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. AIR 1999 SC 100 and N.Eswari v. K. Swarajya Lakshmi (2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 678.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 821 - Full Document

Shiv Sarup Gupta vs Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta on 30 July, 1999

At this stage, it may be noticed that in a catena of judgments, it has been settled that the Revisional Court is not to interfere in the concurrent findings recorded by the Rent Controller as well as the CR No.2214 of 2011 (O&M) 19 Appellate Authority to arrive at a different finding. Reference can be made to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Shiv Sarup Gupta v. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta AIR 1999 SC 2507, Sarla Ahuja v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. AIR 1999 SC 100 and N.Eswari v. K. Swarajya Lakshmi (2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 678.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 974 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Gurdev Singh And Others vs Baljit Kaur And Others on 25 April, 2011

In case Gurdev Singh Vs. Ajmer Kaur 2007(1) RCR 80, it was held by our Hon'ble High Court that fact that landlord got possession of one shop during the pendency of the eviction proceedings and let the same on rent is not relevant. In case Kewal Krishan Vs.Amrik Singh cited supra, some of the shops which were also on rent were sold by the wife of the CR No.2214 of 2011 (O&M) 9 landlord. Our Hon'ble High Court had held that it would have no effect for bonafide need for son.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 2 - R C Gupta - Full Document

N.Eswari vs K.Swarajya Lakshmi on 15 September, 2009

At this stage, it may be noticed that in a catena of judgments, it has been settled that the Revisional Court is not to interfere in the concurrent findings recorded by the Rent Controller as well as the CR No.2214 of 2011 (O&M) 19 Appellate Authority to arrive at a different finding. Reference can be made to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Shiv Sarup Gupta v. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta AIR 1999 SC 2507, Sarla Ahuja v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. AIR 1999 SC 100 and N.Eswari v. K. Swarajya Lakshmi (2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 678.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 15 - T Chatterjee - Full Document
1   2 Next