Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.66 seconds)
State vs . 1. Subhash Sharma S/O Sh. Hans Raj on 16 January, 2012 cites

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation vs Subhash Chandra Sharma & Ors on 15 March, 2000

State Vs. Subhash Sharma and others 2/45 On 10.04.2008 dead body of deceased Sarvesh was shifted from St. Stephen's Hospital to mortuary of GTB Hospital. IO had completed inquest proceedings by filling inquest form Ex.PW10/G, filling up request for postmortem Ex.PW10/H and recorded statement of father of deceased Ex.PW1/B and Narender Kumar Ex.PW7/A regarding identification of dead body of deceased. After postmortem of the deceased, the dead body was handed over to the relatives of deceased. IO had prepared the site plan of the place of occurrence vide Ex.PW10/B. During the course of investigation, accused persons were arrested for the offences u/s 498­A/ 304­B/34 IPC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 128 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Teg Bahadur & Ors on 29 September, 2004

109.Even, 'soon before death' no circumstances have been proved by the prosecution connecting the accused persons subjected to cruelty or harassment upon deceased on account of demand of dowry. As no physical injury has been suggested either in her MLC or in her postmortem report. In terms of section 113B Evidence Act the term 'soon before death' lead to presumption that accused persons had caused dowry death. Since in the present case ingredients of section 304B IPC have not been fulfilled. Hon'ble Supreme Court in case "State of Rajasthan Vs. Teg Bahadur, 2004(8) J.T. 116", has held that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 55 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next