Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.26 seconds)

Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984

67. The evidence adduced by the prosecution dominantly is circumstantial in nature with no direct proof of the perpetration of the alleged offence by the appellant. It is a trite proposition, judicially evolved, that circumstantial evidence if is to form the basis of conviction must be such so as to rule out every possible hypothesis of innocence of the accused and must without any element of doubt unerringly point to such culpability. This enunciation has stood the test of time over the years and the five golden principles 64 propounded by this Court in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra (1984) 4 SCC 116 (paragraph
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3286 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next