Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.65 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Madhukar And Ors vs Sangram And Ors on 20 April, 2001
188, para 15 and Madhukar v. Sangram (2001) 4
SCC 756, SCC p. 758, para 5.)
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Vinod Kumar vs Gangadhar on 13 October, 2014
"13. An appellate court is the final court of facts. The
judgment of the appellate court must therefore reflect court's
application of mind and record its findings supported by
reasons. The law relating to powers and duties of the first
::: Downloaded on - 28/11/2018 22:57:03 :::HCHP
20
appellate court is well fortified by the legal provisions and
judicial pronouncements. Considering the nature and scope of
duty of first appellate court, in Vinod Kumar v. Gangadhar
.
The Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972
Santosh Hazari vs Purushottam Tiwari (Dead) By Lrs on 8 February, 2001
In Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari (2001) 3
SCC 179, this Court held as under: (SCC pp. 188-89,
para 15)
"15. ... The appellate court has jurisdiction to
reverse or affirm the findings of the trial court.
Laliteshwar Prasad Singh & Ors vs S.P.Srivastava(D) Tr.Lr on 15 December, 2016
26. The scope, ambit and power of the first Appellate Court
while deciding the first appeal have been subject matter of various
judicial pronouncements and I may refer to the pronouncement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Laliteshwar Prasad Singh & Ors. versus
S.P. Srivastava (dead) through legal representatives (2017) 2 SCC
415, wherein it was held as under:-
1