Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)

Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath And Others vs The State on 28 July, 1961

PW-2 F.I. Satish Kumar Gupta confirmed in his cross-examination that sample should be representative and analytic result of two Analysts should be identical. To a specific question as put by the Ld. Defence Counse, PW-2 F.I. Satish Kumar Gupta deposed that he cannot say that if one Analyst finds colour sunset yellow FCF in one counterpart and another Analyst did not find the same, it is indicative of the fact that the sample was not representative. No explanation whatsoever has come on record on behalf of the complainant in respect of divergent analytic results in respect of artificial colouring matter and presence of Lakh/Kesari Dal by the two Analyst in respect of counterpart of same sample. Thereby relying upon Kanshi Nath versus State (supra), I am of the considered opinion that the sample was not representative."
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 566 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document
1