Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)
Kangjam Jayanta Singh vs Lisham Anilkumar Singh And 5 Others on 14 August, 2025 cites

Century Flour Mills Ltd. vs S. Suppiah And Ors. on 11 March, 1975

In Century Flour Mills Ltd. v. S. Suppiah [AIR 1975 Mad 270 : (1975) 2 MLJ 54] it was held by a Full Bench of the Madras High Court that where an act is done in violation of an order of stay or injunction, it is the duty of the court, as a policy, to set the wrong right and not allow the perpetuation of the wrongdoing. The inherent power of the court, it was held, is not only available in such a case, but it is bound to exercise it to undo the wrong in the interest of justice. That was a case where a meeting was held contrary to an order of injunction. The Court refused to recognise that the holding of the meeting is a legal one. It put back the parties in the same position as they stood immediately prior to the service of the interim order.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 130 - Full Document

Delhi Development Authority vs Skipper Construction Company(P) Ltd. & ... on 6 May, 1996

"86. This Court in DDA v. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and Another reported in (1996) 4 SCC 622, held that the legal Page | 24 consequences of what has been done in breach of or in violation of the order of stay or injunction should be undone and the parties could be put back to the same position as they stood immediately prior to such order of stay or injunction to not let the defaulting party enjoy any undue advantage. This Court while relying upon cases decided by various High Courts held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 540 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Balwantbhai Somabhai Bhandari vs Hiralal Somabhai Contractor ... on 6 September, 2023

[25] Whereas, the learned senior counsel Mr. M. Rarry in this matter relating to the issues in between the complainant/petitioner against Page | 22 the respondents/accused by facilitating the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Balwantbhai Somabhai Bhandari Vs. Hiralal Somabhai Contractor (Deceased) represented by LRs and others reported in (2023) 17 SCC 545. In this judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India had addressed the issues of Contempt of Courts - Civil Contempt - Willful disobedience/contumacious conduct- What is "willful disobedience". Several judgments have been perused by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India but the word expression, "willful" means act or omission which is done voluntarily or intentionally and with specific intent to do something which law forbids or with specific intent to fail to do something law requires to be done, that is to say with bad purpose either to disobey or to disregard law- it signifies a deliberate action done with evil intent or with a bad motive or purpose and the same has been addressed in detail in para 49 and para 55.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1