Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.47 seconds)Section 106 in The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994. [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994. [Entire Act]
The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994.
Section 208 in The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994. [Entire Act]
Section 111 in The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994. [Entire Act]
Ram Nath Mandal And Ors. vs Jojan Mandal And Ors. on 26 August, 1963
(i) Sita Maharani v. Cheddi Mahto, AIR 1955 SC 328, (ii) Budh Ram v. Ralla Ram (1987) 4 SCC 75, (iii) Sanyasi Raju v. Kandula Kamappadu, AIR 1960 AP 85, (iv) Ram Nath Mandal v. Jojan Mandal, AIR 1964 Patna 1, Full Bench.
Damadilal And Others vs Parashram And Others on 7 May, 1976
The Supreme Court in the case of Damadilal v. Parashram, AIR 1976 SC 2229 said :-
Pooran Chand vs Motilal And Ors. on 11 December, 1962
17. The same view would be found in a case reported as Pooran Chand v. Motilal, AIR 1964 SC 461.
Firm Sardarilal Vlshwanath And Ors vs Pritam Singh on 14 August, 1978
18. Again the matter was considered in the case of Firm Sardarilal Vishwanath v. Pritam Singh (1979) 1 SCR 111 = AIR 1978 SC 1518. The lease in the above case came to an end by efflux of time. The tenant continued in possession and became a so called statutory tenant. The argument put before the Supreme Court was that a notice under Section 106 of the Act was necessary. This argument was rejected. The observations made are as under :-