Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.41 seconds)Section 433 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd vs M. W. Pradhan on 21 March, 1966
The High Court after referring to the decision of the Supreme Court, in Harinagar Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. M.W. Pradhan [1966] 36 Comp Cas 426 observed (page 635 of 66 Comp Cas) :
Garikapatti Veeraya vs N. Subbiah Choudhury on 1 February, 1957
In Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry, , the apex court while considering the maintainability of appeal to the Federal Court and whether such right is a vested right, enunciated the principles and one of the principles is that the legal pursuit of a remedy, suit, appeal and second appeal are really but steps in a series of proceedings all connected by an intrinsic unity and are to be regarded as one legal proceeding (other principles are not relevant for the purpose of the present case).
Maria Cristina De Souza Sodder And Ors. vs Amria Zurana Pereira Pinto And Ors. on 30 August, 1978
In Maria Christine De Souza Soddar v. Maria Zurna Pereira Pinto, , the apex court was considering the effect of extension of the Civil Procedure Code to the Union Territories of Goa, Daman and Diu and the impact of corresponding repealing provisions of the Portuguese Code and held as under (page 1355) :
Union Of India And Ors vs West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. & Anr on 5 February, 2004
In Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. the apex court while considering the effect of appeal observed as under (page 753) :
Chandi Prasad & Ors vs Jagdish Prasad & Ors on 1 October, 2004
In Chandi Prasad v. Jagdish Prasad [2004] 6 ALD 75 the apex court while considering the doctrine of merger for the purpose of limitation observed as under :
Vallabhaneni Lakshmana Swamy And Anr. vs Valluru Basavaiah And Ors. on 23 April, 2004
In Vallabhaneni Lakshmana Swamy v. Valluru Basavaiah the observations of a larger Bench of this court in para. 21 are relied upon with reference to the vested right of appeal and the consequences of pendency of an appeal.
National Conduits (P) Ltd vs S. S. Arora on 1 September, 1967
35. Learned counsel also relied upon the decision of the apex court in National Conduits P. Ltd. v. S.S. Arora , in support of the contention that even if a petition for winding up is admitted, it need not be automatically be ordered to be advertised in the newspapers, which would have serious and adverse impact on the company against which the petition is filed.
Hind Overseas Private Limited vs Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwalla And Anr on 10 October, 1975
In Hind Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwalla the apex court observed as under :