Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.30 seconds)

M/S. Ananda Social And Educational ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax on 19 February, 2020

7. Section 12AA of the Act provides for procedure for registration. The Commissioner of Income Tax is required to satisfy himself about the objects of the Trust and genuineness of its activities and has to grant registration only if it is so satisfied. The scope of examination is confined in ascertaining whether the Trust is constituted genuinely for 9 carrying on charitable activities or whether it has the capacity to carry out its professed objects. It is also well settled legal proposition that at the time of grant of registration, Commissioner of Income Tax is not required to examine the application of income and has to examine whether the objects of the Trust are charitable and whether the application is made in consonant with requirements of Section 12A of the Act read with Rule 17F of the Income Tax Rules. The genuineness of the activities of the Trust is not a matter to be looked into at the time of dealing with the issue of registration of the Trust under Section 12AA of the Act. (See: 'DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX Vs. GARDEN CITY EDUCATIONAL TRUST' (2010) 191 Taxman 238 (KAR) AND 'ANANDA SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX' (2020) 114 Taxmann.com 693 (SC)).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 71 - S A Bobde - Full Document

The Director Of Income Tax vs M/S Garden City Educational Trust on 15 July, 2009

7. Section 12AA of the Act provides for procedure for registration. The Commissioner of Income Tax is required to satisfy himself about the objects of the Trust and genuineness of its activities and has to grant registration only if it is so satisfied. The scope of examination is confined in ascertaining whether the Trust is constituted genuinely for 9 carrying on charitable activities or whether it has the capacity to carry out its professed objects. It is also well settled legal proposition that at the time of grant of registration, Commissioner of Income Tax is not required to examine the application of income and has to examine whether the objects of the Trust are charitable and whether the application is made in consonant with requirements of Section 12A of the Act read with Rule 17F of the Income Tax Rules. The genuineness of the activities of the Trust is not a matter to be looked into at the time of dealing with the issue of registration of the Trust under Section 12AA of the Act. (See: 'DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX Vs. GARDEN CITY EDUCATIONAL TRUST' (2010) 191 Taxman 238 (KAR) AND 'ANANDA SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX' (2020) 114 Taxmann.com 693 (SC)).
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Sole Trustee Loka Shikshana Turst vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mysore on 28 August, 1975

5. On the other hand, learned Senior counsel for the assessee submitted that the Tribunal has recorded a finding a fact that primary object of the assessee is for charitable purpose and the aforesaid finding of fact has not been demonstrated to be perverse. Therefore, no substantial questions of law arises for consideration. It is further submitted that since the object of the Trust is education, therefore, the nature of activity of the assessee being commercial or for business, cannot be gone into as the object of the assessee is not for advancement of any other object of general public utility. It is further submitted that since the activities of the Trust have not yet commenced, therefore, no inference with regard to its nature of activity can be drawn. It is also urged that at the time of registration of the Trust, the Commissioner should not go into the genuineness of its activity. It is also pointed out that decision of the Supreme 7 Court in SOLE TRUSTEE, LOK SHIKSHANA TRUST, supra is no longer a good law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 2203 - H R Khanna - Full Document
1   2 Next