Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.21 seconds)

N. L. Devender Singh & Ors vs Syed Khaja on 3 August, 1973

11. In the instant case, the vendor has failed to rebut the presumption, and in fact no such foundation was laid in the written statement or any proof at the trial. The vendee has been throughout willing to perform his part of the contract and in fact, agreed for the additional price demanded by the vendor to avoid breach of the agreement. The ratio of the decision rendered in M.L. Devender Singh's case (supra) does not help the vendor but it squarely covers the case of the vendee. In that case, the facts were as under :
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 81 - M H Beg - Full Document

The State Of Orissa vs Sudhansu Sekhar Misra And Ors on 7 November, 1967

12. Some observations made in the body of the judgment, while discussing the relevant provisions of the statute, can not be read out of context as suggested by the counsel. A decision is an authority for what it actually decides. A reference can be usefully made to the following observations of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra, :
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 962 - K S Hegde - Full Document
1