Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.43 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 155 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sudhir Mandal vs State Of Punjab on 11 July, 2022
In Sudo Mandal's case, the Hon'ble Division Bench
was examining the judgment of conviction delivered by the
trial Court against the two appellants, who were in appeal.
After considering the evidence, this Court proceeded to hold
that the prosecution had failed to establish the charges and,
4 of 9
::: Downloaded on - 17-09-2023 21:30:20 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:113447
CRM-M-4122-2018 #5# 2023:PHHC:113447
therefore, reversed the conviction and ordered acquittal of
convicts. At the same time, this Court proceeded to quash the
FIR in respect of three proclaimed offenders, who had neither
filed any petition nor made any prayer for quashing of the
FIR, but the Court suo motu exercised the inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. without even referring any case
law on the subject. Therefore, with respect, but without
hesitation, it is observed that the judgment in Sudo Mandal's
case, apparently is deviation from other consistent law, on
exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. laid down by
Hon'ble Supreme Court, and, therefore, the same cannot be
treated as a precedent. Similarly, the other two judgments
relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner are of no
help. Time and again, this Court as well the Hon'ble Supreme
Court have laid down that the inherent powers under Section
482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised with care and
circumspection considering the facts and circumstances of the
case.