Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)
Susetha vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors on 8 August, 2006 cites

Animal And Environment Legal Defence ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 5 March, 1997

Concededly, the water bodies are required to be retained. Such requirement is envisaged not only in view of the fact that the right to water as also quality life are envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, but also in view of the fact that the same has been recognized in Articles 47 and 48-A of the Constitution of India. Article 51-A of the Constitution of India furthermore makes a fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life. [See Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund v. Union of India and Ors., AIR (1997) SC 1071; M.C. Mehta (Badkhal and Surajkund Lakes Matter v. Union of India and Ors., [1997] 3 SCC 715 and Intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi v. State of A.P. and Ors., [2006] 3 SCC 549.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 68 - S V Manohar - Full Document
1   2 Next