Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.31 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 62 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
The test laid down by Lord Atkin has been quoted
in the judgment of Fazal Ali, J. in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v.
State of Maharashtra (supra) and His Lordship has held that
Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act is an exception to the rule
of hearsay evidence and in view of the peculiar conditions in
the Indian Society has widen the sphere to avoid injustice. His
Lordship has held that where the main evidence consists of
statements and letters written by the deceased which are
directly connected with or related to her death and which
reveal a tell-tale story, the said statements would clearly fall
within the four corners of Section 32 and, therefore, admissible
and the distance of time alone in such cases would not make
the statements irrelevant.
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal on 14 July, 2020
17.1 It is also observed in the above Judgment that,
Section 65-B of the Evidence Act does not speak of the stage at
which the certifcate must be furnished to the Court. It is
further observed that, the Judgment in Anvar P. V. Vs. P. K.
Basheer and Ors.; [2014] 10 SCC 473, as clarifed in the
Judgment [Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao
Gorantyal and Ors. (Supra)] was the law declared by the
Hon'ble Apex Court on Section 65-B of the Evidence Act.