Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)Jit Ram Shiv Kumar And Ors. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Anr. Etc on 16 April, 1980
In the case of Ram
Kumar v. State of Haryana, reported in AIR 1995 SC 280, Supreme Court
has held as under:
Rajesh Singh & Ors vs State Of U.P on 28 March, 2011
11. As observed by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajesh Singh & Others vs.
State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2011) 11 SCC 444 and in the case
of Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar Khan and Another vs. State of Madhya
Pradesh reported in (2011) 6 SCC 394, while dealing with the judgment
of acquittal, unless reasoning by the learned trial Court is found to
be perverse, the acquittal cannot be upset. It is further observed
that High Court's interference in such appeal in somewhat
circumscribed and if the view taken by the learned trial Court is
possible on the evidence, the High Court should stay its hands and
not interfere in the matter in the belief that if it had been the
trial Court, it might have taken a different view.
Bhaiyamiyan @ Jardar Khan & Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 May, 2011
12. Considering the
aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and law laid down by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court while considering the scope of appeal under
Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no case is made out to
interfere with the impugned judgment and order of acquittal.