cites: 122602434

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

As per copy of driving licence of the deceased (Ex.PW1/1), the date of birth of deceased was 07.08.1989 and as such he was aged about 25 years 01 month approximately on the date of accident. Accordingly, as held in Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. (2009) 6 SCC 121, the multiplier of 17 is to be adopted for the purpose of assessment.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013

138/2011, decided on 06.09.2013, went into this question and held that in view of the re- port in S.K. Kapoor (supra), the three Judge Bench decision in Reshma Kumari & Ors. (supra) shall be taken as a binding prece- dent."

Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 2700 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 58770

Lalta Devi & Anr. vs Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors. on 12 January, 2015

"7. As far as addition towards future prospects is concerned, the issue has been examined at great length by this Court in HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Lalta Devi & Ors. (supra). Paras 9 to 21 of the report in Lalta Devi are extracted hereunder:-

Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 578 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Poonam And Anr. on 27 May, 2015

The observations made by the Hon'ble High Court on the aspect of addition of future prospects as discussed in para 21 to 23 of MAC No. 79 of 2014 Bharti AXA General Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Smt. Poonam & Ors. decided on 27.05.2015 (supra) may be beneficially quoted:

Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 70 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs S.K.Kapoor on 16 March, 2011

138/2011, decided on 06.09.2013, went into this question and held that in view of the re- port in S.K. Kapoor (supra), the three Judge Bench decision in Reshma Kumari & Ors. (supra) shall be taken as a binding prece- dent."

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 532 - Full Document

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 94259

Abati Bezbaruah vs Dy. Director General Geological Survey ... on 14 February, 2003

ala SRTC v. Susamma Thomas, (1994) 2 SCC 176 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 335], Sarla Dixit [(1996) 3 SCC 179] and Abati Bezbaruah [Abati Bezbaruah v. Geological Survey of India, (2003) 3 SCC 148 : 2003 SCC (Cri) 746] and in para 24 of the Report held as un- der: (Sarla Verma case [Sarla Verma v. DTC, (2009) 6 SCC 121 : (2009) 2 SCC (Civ) 770 :

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 539 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Sanjay Verma vs Haryana Roadways on 29 January, 2014

15. The divergence of opinion was noted by another three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Sanjay Verma v. Haryana Road- ways, (2014) 3 SCC 210. In paras 14 and 15, the Supreme Court observed as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 268 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Central Board Of Dawoodi Bohra ... vs State Of Maharashtra&Anr on 17 December, 2004

(1) The law laid down by this Court in a decision delivered by a Bench of larger strength is binding on any sub-

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 682 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]