Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.03 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Bhawsar Home Furnishers And Decorators vs Dattaram Pandurang Mistri And Ors. on 25 September, 1987
4. Aggrieved by the action of the Labour Court, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing this petition. According to the counsel for the petitioners, Labour Court was not justified in dismissing the applications without making an enquiry into the claim of the petitioners that they were the employees of the respondent No. 1. Reliance is placed in this connection on the decisions of this Court in Furnishers and Decorators, Bombay v. D. P. Mistri, 1988 (1) LLN 495 and Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. Aditya N. S. Oupadhyay & Ors. 1993 I LLJ 839 and the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Desai Brothers Ltd. v. Smt. Laxmibai Peddmolla, 1988 (2) LLN. 186. The counsel for the petitioners also placed reliance on a post-card in support of his contention that the petitioners were in employment of the respondent No. 1.
1