Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.43 seconds)Ct Mukesh Kumar Yadav vs Gnct Of Delhi And Ors. on 20 September, 2017
10.2.2022 in Ct. Sumit Sharma (supra) and a batch of cases.
Therefore, the present OA deserves to be partly allowed and the
same is partly allowed with the following directions:-
Sumit Sharma & Ors vs State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 5 April, 2016
10. From a perusal of the aforesaid, it appears that the learned Tribunal
has allowed the original application filed by the respondent not only by
following its earlier decision dated 10.02.2022 in OA No. 1383/2020 titled
Ct. Sumit Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. but also after perusing
the dismissal order dated 04.01.2017, from which, it opined that the reasons
given by the petitioners for dispensing with the enquiry did not fall within
the ambit of Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India. Since, learned
counsel for the petitioners has vehemently urged that there were sufficient
reasons in the dismissal order for dispensing with the departmental enquiry,
it would be apposite to note the reasons recorded in the dismissal order dated
04.01.2017 for dispensing with the enquiry. The relevant extracts of the
order dated 04.01.2017 reads as under:-
1