Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (2.95 seconds)

State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others vs Dr.Hitesh Gupta And Others on 19 March, 2016

The case property was sealed with seal of 'RS' and after sealing the same, it was handed over to SI Ramveer Singh. The rukka was prepared by ACP Ram Kishan and sent to PS Lajpat Nagar for registration of the case through HC Hari Om. The investigation of the case was handed over to SI VKP Singh by ACP Ram Kishan. During investigation, the car bearing no. DL-3C_-5050 was taken in police possession vide seizure memo PW-3/G. Thereafter, IO conducted the personal search of the accused persons viz. Hitesh, Kamlesh and Shaina and arrested State Vs. Hitesh & Ors.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Girja Prasad (Dead) By Lrs vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 August, 2007

28. It has also been argued that no independent public wit- nesses were made to join the raid, despite the spot being a regular market place which generally has public presence even up till late hours in the day. The witnesses examined have stated that de- spite some public persons present near the spot being asked to join the investigation, they citing their reasons refused to partici- pate. It is settled law as held in as held in Girja Prasad v State of MP [(2007) 7 SCC 625] that law does not mandate that testi- monies of police witnesses should not be accepted, unless cor- roborated in material particulars by other independent evidence, as the presumption that every person acts honestly applies equally to a police official and that 'no infirmity attaches to the testimony of police officials merely because they belong to the police force'. It is pertinent to keep in view that the police offi- cials have no axe to grind and cannot be presumptively labelled as 'interested witnesses', unless there is material gathered or set forth to show otherwise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 670 - C K Thakker - Full Document
1   2 Next