Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)
Retail Royalty Company & Anr. vs Nirbhay Marg News Broadcast Private ... on 25 April, 2023 cites

Satya Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors vs Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd. on 7 February, 2013

6. Counsel for the plaintiffs places reliance on the judgment of this Court in Satya Infrastructure Ltd. and Ors. v. Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd., 2013 SCC OnLine Del 508 to contend that in the event the defendants have failed to appear in the proceedings and voluntarily chosen not to respond to the plaint, it is indicative of the fact that the defendants have nothing substantial to urge, by way of a response to the allegations in the plaint. Counsel for the plaintiffs submits that this is a fit case where a Summary Judgment in terms of Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, as applicable to commercial disputes of a specified value, read with Rule 27 of the Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022 (in short, 'IPD Rules'), deserves to be passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendant.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 465 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Surya Food & Agro Ltd vs Om Traders & Anr on 20 January, 2023

9. At the outset, reference may be made to the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Surya Food & Agro Ltd. v. Om Traders, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 265, where this Court has observed that under Rule 3 of Chapter X-A of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, a Court can on its own decide the disputes by a summary judgment without a formal application being moved by any party.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - V Bakhru - Full Document
1