Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.32 seconds)
Sharan Agarwal vs Ansal Properties And Infracture Ltd on 16 March, 2023 cites

Pioneer Urban Land And Infrastructure ... vs Govindan Raghavan on 2 April, 2019

In Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited v. Govindan Raghavan, (2019) 5 SCC 725, there was a delay of almost two years in obtaining an occupancy certificate after the date stipulated in the ABA. As a consequence, there was a failure to provide possession of the flat to the purchaser within a reasonable period. This Court dwelt on the terms of the ABA under which the builder was entitled to charge interest at 18 per cent per annum for the delay in payment of instalments by the purchaser. On the other hand, the failure to provide possession on the part of the developer was subject to a             -25-   grace period of twelve months followed by a termination notice of ninety days and a further period of ninety days to the developer to effect a refund. Adverting to these clauses, the court noted:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 350 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Samruddhi Co Operative Housing Society ... vs Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. ... on 11 January, 2022

[Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd v. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 35, decided on 11.01.2022] आकूपेंसी सर्टिफिकेट के बिना किसी भूमि का कब्‍जा यदि दे भी दिया जाए तो वह विधि के अन्‍तर्गत कब्‍जा नहीं माना जाएगा। इस सम्‍बन्‍ध में मा0 सवोच्‍च न्‍यायालय के निम्‍नलिखित निर्णय महत्‍वपूर्ण हैं :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 19 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 Next